Try all features for free — 3 credits included on sign-upTry for free
Skip to main content
Regulation · Employee rights

Your employer and AI: what the European law now prohibits.

Since 2 August 2026, the AI Act imposes strict limits on the use of AI in the workplace. Mandatory transparency, targeted prohibitions, and new responsibilities: here's what your employer can no longer do, and how to verify compliance.

Jérémy Pierre
Jérémy Pierre
AI Act Compliance Expert
4 August 2026 7 min read
Your employer and AI: what the European law now prohibits
Key takeaways · 4 figures to remember
6
prohibited practices since 2025
2 August 2026
transparency obligations in force
€35M
maximum fine for non-compliance
100%
of employees covered by transparency rules
01 - Regulation

What the AI Act prohibits for your employer since 2025

The AI Act introduced six strictly prohibited practices for employers. These rules, applicable since February 2025, aim to protect employees from abusive uses of AI.

Among the most relevant prohibitions for the workplace:

1

Emotion analysis at work

The use of AI systems to infer employees' emotions is prohibited, except in very specific cases such as medical safety. This rule applies to facial or voice recognition tools used to assess employees' moods.

2

Professional social scoring

The AI Act prohibits systems that evaluate or rank employees based on their social or professional behaviour if these assessments influence their working conditions or career opportunities.

3

Subliminal manipulation

Techniques aimed at manipulating employees' behaviour through subliminal stimuli, such as hidden messages in software interfaces, are prohibited.

These prohibitions apply regardless of the company's size or sector. Employers must audit their existing tools to ensure compliance with these rules. Article 5 of the AI Act details all prohibited practices.

02 - Transparency

Mandatory transparency since 2 August 2026

Article 50 of the AI Act now requires employers to clearly inform employees when AI systems are used in their work environment.

This transparency obligation covers several aspects:

  • The identification of AI systems used, including a description of their purpose.
  • The methods of interaction between employees and these systems.
  • Employees' rights regarding these tools, particularly in terms of data protection.

For generative AI systems, such as chatbots or content generation tools, the employer must also clearly indicate when content has been generated or modified by AI. This obligation applies even if the tool is integrated into broader software, such as a CRM or productivity tool.

"Transparency is not optional: it is a legal obligation. Employers must document their AI systems and inform employees in a clear and accessible manner."

Employers must also implement mechanisms allowing employees to report issues or concerns related to AI use. The AI Office provides guidelines to help businesses comply with these requirements.

03 - Human resources

HR tools and AI: legal limits

AI systems used in HR processes are particularly regulated by the AI Act due to their potential impact on employees' rights.

Key tools affected include:

1

Recruitment and selection

AI systems used to screen CVs or assess candidates must meet strict transparency and non-discrimination criteria. Employers must be able to explain decisions made by these tools.

2

Performance evaluation

AI tools used to evaluate employee performance must be designed to avoid bias and ensure fairness. Evaluation criteria must be documented and accessible to employees.

3

Career management

AI systems used to recommend training or career development must be transparent and avoid perpetuating existing discrimination. Employees must have access to the criteria used by these tools.

Employers must also ensure these tools comply with the GDPR, particularly regarding personal data protection. The CNIL has published specific recommendations for AI use in HR processes.

04 - Compliance

How to check your company's compliance

Employees can play an active role in verifying their employer's compliance with AI Act obligations.

Here are some steps to assess the situation:

  1. Identify AI tools used: Request a list of AI systems deployed in the company, including their purpose and provider.
  2. Verify transparency: Ensure the employer has informed employees about the use of these tools and that AI-generated content is clearly identified.
  3. Review HR processes: Check that AI tools used in HR processes meet transparency and non-discrimination criteria.
  4. Consult documentation: Request access to technical documentation and risk assessments for the AI systems used.

Employers must also designate an AI Act compliance officer, who may be the Data Protection Officer (DPO) or another competent person. This officer must be accessible to employees to address their questions and concerns.

For further guidance, employees can use tools such as the AiActo assessment to quickly evaluate their company's compliance.

05 - Recourse

What to do in case of non-compliance

If an employee finds that their employer is not complying with AI Act obligations, several courses of action are available.

First, it is recommended to alert the AI Act compliance officer or the company's DPO. These individuals are responsible for addressing reports and taking necessary corrective measures.

If this internal approach yields no results, the employee may:

  • Contact the competent authorities, such as the CNIL in France or the AI Office at EU level.
  • Consult a solicitor specialising in employment law or data protection to explore potential legal remedies.
  • Use internal or external reporting mechanisms established by the company, in line with GDPR obligations.

Fines for non-compliance with the AI Act can reach up to €35 million or 7% of the company's global turnover, whichever is higher. These penalties aim to ensure respect for employees' rights and the protection of personal data.

Is your employer complying with the AI Act?

Identify your company's obligations and non-compliance risks in 3 minutes.

06 - FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about employees' rights regarding AI in the workplace.

No. Since February 2025, the AI Act explicitly prohibits the use of AI systems to infer employees' emotions, except in very specific cases such as medical safety. This prohibition applies to all facial or voice recognition tools used to assess employees' moods or emotional states.

Yes. Since 2 August 2026, the AI Act requires employers to clearly inform employees when AI systems are used in their work environment, including for performance assessments. This information must include the system's purpose, interaction methods, and employees' rights regarding the tool.

Fines for non-compliance with the AI Act can reach up to €35 million or 7% of the company's global turnover, whichever is higher. These penalties aim to ensure respect for employees' rights and the protection of personal data. In case of non-compliance, employees may contact the competent authorities, such as the CNIL or the AI Office.

To verify a tool's compliance, you can request your employer's technical documentation, risk assessment, and measures implemented to ensure transparency and non-discrimination. You may also consult the AI Office guidelines or use tools such as the AiActo assessment for a quick evaluation.

No. The AI Act requires full transparency regarding the use of AI systems, including for automated decisions. Your employer must clearly inform you when AI is used to make decisions about you, such as performance evaluations, training recommendations, or task assignments. You also have the right to request an explanation of how these systems work and the criteria used.

Jérémy Pierre
Jérémy Pierre
Founder aiacto.eu · AI Act Compliance Expert

Supports providers and deployers of AI in achieving regulatory compliance.

Share this article